Steam engines date far back in our history as means used for transportation. Speaking historically steam was used to drive larger vehicles like trains and smaller vehicles like the automobile. Steam is a very clean economically method of fuel. It is estimated that a vehicle could go 80 miles with a steam driven engine. Environmentalists are now embracing the idea of using hybrid vehicles that use the steam engine to save our eco system from pollution. Perhaps the automakers might decide to reinvent the steam engine in order to provide us with a safer and more economical form of transportation.
Most hybrid vehicles still rely partially on gasoline to fuel their system in order to get better mileage. The automakers are working on the possibilities of making a hybrid that does not rely on gasoline powered vehicles or diesel fuel but to date this has not yet happened. When the first vehicles were created up to the 19th century many of them were steam powered. Then the invention of gasoline engines and the influx of major highways turned all the engine power into gas fueled vehicles. This worked over the centuries and many people are reluctant to change to another resource for their vehicles engine. It is time that perhaps we took a look at the steam engine. The steam driven vehicle runs off of water that boils evaporates and then turns into steam. The pistons on the vehicle run much cleaner keeping the engine clean and powdered. The use of steam was most effective in past centuries to operate a vehicle. Today automakers are not considering the use of steam.
The possibilities that steam provides for us is tremendous. The use of water for your power would really shock the now hard driven economy. You would no longer have to depend on expensive gas and oil. You would not have to depend on electricity and the batter which is expensive if you were using a steam driven vehicle. The vehicle would practically pay for itself because the cost to run it would be nil. This is what puts a scare into the face of economists thinking that consumers could buy a good running vehicle and supply the fuel from the faucet. Then you probably wonder why won’t automakers consider making steam driven vehicles? The cons against the steam engine are due mostly to safety. Steam is a very dangerous type of fuel. The engine would have to be able to take the pressure without exploding and the person driving the vehicle would have to be ever cautious that they did not let the pressure build up to the danger zone. The vehicle would have to be kept at a certain temperature level which has not yet controllable. The automakers should work on the possibilities of using the steam engine and what they can do to take care of the danger that derives from them. Sometimes the first invention can be the best you only need to improve upon it to make it work.
|



May 30th, 2009 at 8:00 pm
You make many good points, But you need to do your homework.steam power has not only been around for centuries but it is still in use today something like 80% of our electricity is produced by steam,any nuclear reactor is basically a glorified steam engine.
First you must have a heat source to boil the water,you burn fuel to create that heat, the beauty is a steam engine does not care what kind of fuel you use dirty, clean, or even nuclear.
Second,Flash boilers do not explode,at worst the will vent their pressure through a ruptured tube.
they are a wonderfully adaptable power source from aircraft carriers all the way down to r/c models.
I wont take up any more of your time but take advantage of this wonderful source of information we have and do searches on steam cars,steam boats, steam tractors, and even steam airplanes that actually flew with good performance.